(How 'bout it Alessi? - promoted by MediaCzech)
The Family Foundation always seems to be a thorn in the ass and the poison in the belly that slows progress in Kentucky, either by spreading their hate via the Kentucky Citizen or standing on their hypocritical stump preaching against gambling in Kentucky. The Family Foundation has teamed up, as always, with Say No to Casinos to spread the word of GOD and to stop Vito Corleone from making Kentucky his home. I thought this country was built on the foundation of, We the People, not we the Kentucky General Assembly. When an issue of such polarity such as a constitutional amendment for and or against casino gaming is being debated; it is in the best interest of the members of the Kentucky General Assembly to listen to the people. We know these right wingers only use the Constitution when it suits them. They seem to have no problem distorting the spirit of our Constitution by making the ridiculous suggestion that Kentucky Lawmakers should ignore the people's voice. Of course they are following the wingnut rule of comparing everything to the evil land of California, now we wait to hear how casinos will make every woman between the ages of 18 and 25 become abortion robots. More amazingly is the fact that these two hacks, pun intended, John Mark Hack from Say No to Casinos and, of course, the Family Foundation's Ken Ostrander say the people have no voice in this matter. From Pol Watchers Say No to Casinos organization chairman John-Mark Hack and Family Foundation executive director Kent Ostrander said lawmakers are misinterpreting the state constitution if they believe that their votes to amend the commonwealth's guiding legal document represent "letting the people decide." "There is no let-the-people-decide-cop-out option," Hack said at a press conference in the rotunda. I seem to remember an opposite argument for the constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage back in 2004.
From the Bluegrass Report (Tuesday, March 21, 2006) First, it was audaciously hypocritical to listen to Ostrander -- the man who led charge in 2004 to give the voters the option of amending the state's constitution to ban gay marriage -- argue that those same voters ought not have that same right on this issue. In 2004, Ostrander said this about the gay marriage amendment. "This was just a single issue that we tossed out there to the people of Kentucky to let them wrestle with," Ostrander said. How to you interpret that? I think it is called being a hypocrite. If the press gives these two any ink, they better mention their hypocritical form of politics. From the Bluegrass Report (Tuesday, March 21, 2006) This morning, Jim Navolio, the Executive Director of the Kentucky Equine Education Project (KEEP), e-mailed me about last night's show and during a back and forth about the issue (I am not a member of KEEP and have only met Jim in passing a few times) he mentioned that Hack had first approached KEEP in the summer of 2004 about being hired to do its public relations work, but was not selected. I guess he, Hack, saw GOD and changed his ways. Bullshit. Crossposted on The Rural Democrat |